↓ Skip to main content

Solution Structure and Characterization of the LGR8 Receptor Binding Surface of Insulin-like Peptide 3*

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Solution Structure and Characterization of the LGR8 Receptor Binding Surface of Insulin-like Peptide 3*
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, July 2006
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m603829200
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Johan Rosengren, Suode Zhang, Feng Lin, Norelle L. Daly, Daniel J. Scott, Richard A. Hughes, Ross A.D. Bathgate, David J. Craik, John D. Wade

Abstract

Insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3), a member of the relaxin peptide family, is produced in testicular Leydig cells and ovarian thecal cells. Gene knock-out experiments have identified a key biological role in initiating testes descent during fetal development. Additionally, INSL3 has an important function in mediating male and female germ cell function. These actions are elicited via its recently identified receptor, LGR8, a member of the leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor family. To identify the structural features that are responsible for the interaction of INSL3 with its receptor, its solution structure was determined by NMR spectroscopy together with in vitro assays of a series of B-chain alanine-substituted analogs. Synthetic human INSL3 was found to adopt a characteristic relaxin/insulin-like fold in solution but is a highly dynamic molecule. The four termini of this two-chain peptide are disordered, and additional conformational exchange is evident in the molecular core. Alanine-substituted analogs were used to identify the key residues of INSL3 that are responsible for the interaction with the ectodomain of LGR8. These include Arg(B16) and Val(B19), with His(B12) and Arg(B20) playing a secondary role, as evident from the synergistic effect on the activity in double and triple mutants involving these residues. Together, these amino acids combine with the previously identified critical residue, Trp(B27), to form the receptor binding surface. The current results provide clear direction for the design of novel specific agonists and antagonists of this receptor.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Chemistry 3 14%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#32,956
of 85,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,544
of 90,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#207
of 498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.