Title |
Grading of construction timeber by ultrasound
|
---|---|
Published in |
Wood Science and Technology, February 1989
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00350611 |
Authors |
J. L. Sandoz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 24% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
Professor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 10 | 29% |
Materials Science | 5 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,968,506
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Wood Science and Technology
#21
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,892
of 54,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wood Science and Technology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them