| Title |
Coating Formulations for Microneedles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11095-007-9286-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harvinder S. Gill, Mark R. Prausnitz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 246 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 13% |
| Researcher | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Unknown | 71 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 49 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 12% |
| Engineering | 30 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 16 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 77 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,406,572
of 23,506,079 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#232
of 2,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,955
of 77,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#4
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,506,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.