↓ Skip to main content

Progress in technology for the 2005 height determination of Qomolangma Feng (Mt. Everest)

Overview of attention for article published in Science China Earth Sciences, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Progress in technology for the 2005 height determination of Qomolangma Feng (Mt. Everest)
Published in
Science China Earth Sciences, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11430-006-0531-1
Authors

Junyong Chen, Janli Yuan, Chunxi Guo, Yanping Zhang, Peng Zhang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 50%
Computer Science 1 13%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Science China Earth Sciences
#338
of 543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,843
of 83,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Earth Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them