| Title |
Wild Lactuca germplasm for lettuce breeding: current status, gaps and challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Euphytica, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10681-009-9914-7 |
| Authors |
Aleš Lebeda, Ivana Doležalová, Eva Křístková, Miloslav Kitner, Irena Petrželová, Barbora Mieslerová, Alžběta Novotná |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 75% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,472,403
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#48
of 1,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,222
of 107,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them