| Title |
Negative Poisson's ratio polymeric and metallic foams
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, December 1988
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00551939 |
| Authors |
E. A. Friis, R. S. Lakes, J. B. Park |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 216 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 16% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 51 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 95 | 43% |
| Materials Science | 39 | 18% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 58 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,025,360
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#31
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#862
of 54,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.