| Title |
Cultivation of Chlorella emersonii with flue gas derived from a cement plant
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10811-010-9551-5 |
| Authors |
Clemens G. Borkenstein, Josef Knoblechner, Heike Frühwirth, Michael Schagerl |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 109 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 17% |
| Engineering | 11 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 9 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#4,759,175
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#218
of 2,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,790
of 95,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.