↓ Skip to main content

Unreduced gametes: meiotic mishap or evolutionary mechanism?

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Genetics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unreduced gametes: meiotic mishap or evolutionary mechanism?
Published in
Trends in Genetics, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2014.09.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annaliese S. Mason, J. Chris Pires

Abstract

Unreduced gametes (gametes with the somatic chromosome number) are known to facilitate polyploid formation. Unreduced gametes result from a plethora of different mechanisms across different taxa, suggesting that the ability to produce unreduced gametes has evolutionary utility. Heritable genetic variation for unreduced gamete production has been observed, thereby providing an evolutionary substrate. Unreduced gametes are also frequently involved in interspecific hybridisation events as well as being produced by interspecific hybrids, facilitating allopolyploidisation. Environmental stress often triggers unreduced gamete production, suggesting that unreduced gametes may facilitate polyploid speciation in response to changing environments. Thus, although unreduced gamete formation may be a meiotic mishap, we suggest that unreduced gametes can be more explicitly considered as a mechanism for evolutionary speciation that should be measured and tested across and within lineages for exaptive evolution (a feature with evolutionary utility that has not arisen under conventional selective pressure) and evolvability (the capacity to generate adaptive genetic variation).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 227 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 20%
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Student > Master 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 43 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 137 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 18%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 <1%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 43 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2017.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Genetics
#2,077
of 2,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,395
of 268,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Genetics
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.