| Title |
Nanosuspension Based In Situ Gelling Nasal Spray of Carvedilol: Development, In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AAPS PharmSciTech, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1208/s12249-012-9896-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nilesh S. Saindane, Kunal P. Pagar, Pradeep R. Vavia |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 37 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 48 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,759,175
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#216
of 1,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,811
of 281,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,471 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.