↓ Skip to main content

Hierarchical Threshold Secret Sharing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cryptology, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 238)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Hierarchical Threshold Secret Sharing
Published in
Journal of Cryptology, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00145-006-0334-8
Authors

Tamir Tassa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Turkey 1 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 41 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 31%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Lecturer 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 26 58%
Mathematics 3 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2012.
All research outputs
#4,759,175
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cryptology
#45
of 238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,399
of 161,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cryptology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them