| Title |
Experiences with software-based soft-error mitigation using AN codes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Software Quality Journal, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11219-014-9260-4 |
| Authors |
Martin Hoffmann, Peter Ulbrich, Christian Dietrich, Horst Schirmeier, Daniel Lohmann, Wolfgang Schröder-Preikschat |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 6 | 33% |
| Engineering | 3 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,315,928
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Software Quality Journal
#4
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,455
of 363,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Software Quality Journal
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them