You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In situ rolling circle amplification detection of Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) complementary and viral RNA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virology, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.virol.2012.01.032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cecilia Andersson, Sara Henriksson, Karl-Eric Magnusson, Mats Nilsson, Ali Mirazimi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Virology
#1,588
of 9,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,017
of 167,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology
#6
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.