| Title |
Ligand Binding Assay Critical Reagents and Their Stability: Recommendations and Best Practices from the Global Bioanalysis Consortium Harmonization Team
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AAPS Journal, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1208/s12248-014-9583-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lindsay E. King, Esme Farley, Mami Imazato, Jeannine Keefe, Masood Khan, Mark Ma, K. Susanne Pihl, Priya Sriraman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 36% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,253,363
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#153
of 1,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,285
of 226,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.