| Title |
Identification of FAD2 and FAD3 genes in Brassica napus genome and development of allele-specific markers for high oleic and low linolenic acid contents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00122-012-1863-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qingyong Yang, Chuchuan Fan, Zhenhua Guo, Jie Qin, Jianzhong Wu, Qingyuan Li, Tingdong Fu, Yongming Zhou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 63% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,460,684
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#377
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,537
of 165,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.