| Title |
Novel carbon-based strong acid catalyst from starch and its catalytic activities for acetalization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-011-5472-1 |
| Authors |
Xuezheng Liang, Chunqing Li, Chenze Qi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 6 | 35% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 12% |
| Engineering | 2 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,315,928
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#96
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,872
of 120,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.