| Title |
Technology and Developments for the Random Positioning Machine, RPM
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microgravity Science and Technology, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12217-008-9043-2 |
| Authors |
A. G. Borst, Jack J. W. A. van Loon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
| Researcher | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 39 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 16% |
| Engineering | 17 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 46 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,759,175
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Microgravity Science and Technology
#22
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,844
of 85,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microgravity Science and Technology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.