↓ Skip to main content

SOX10 mutations in chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction suggest a complex physiopathological mechanism

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
44 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
SOX10 mutations in chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction suggest a complex physiopathological mechanism
Published in
Human Genetics, July 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00439-002-0765-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Véronique Pingault, Mathilde Girard, Nadège Bondurand, Huw Dorkins, Lionel Van Maldergem, David Mowat, Takashi Shimotake, Ishwar Verma, Clarisse Baumann, Michel Goossens

Abstract

The type IV Waardenburg syndrome (WS4), also referred to as Shah-Waardenburg syndrome or Waardenburg-Hirschsprung disease, is characterised by the association of Waardenburg features (WS, depigmentation and deafness) and the absence of enteric ganglia in the distal part of the intestine (Hirschsprung disease). Mutations in the EDN3, EDNRB, and SOX10 genes have been reported in this syndrome. Recently, a new SOX10 mutation was observed in a girl with a neural crest disorder without evidence of depigmentation, but with severe constipation due to a chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction and persistence of enteric ganglia. To refine the nosology of WS, we studied patients with typical WS4 (including Hirschsprung disease) or with WS and intestinal pseudo-obstruction. We found three SOX10 mutations, one EDNRB and one EDN3 mutations in patients presenting with the classical form of WS4, and two SOX10 mutations in patients displaying chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction and WS features. These results show that chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction may be a manifestation associated with WS, and indicate that aganglionosis is not the only mechanism underlying the intestinal dysfunction of patients with SOX10 mutations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Other 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,722,978
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#960
of 2,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,416
of 45,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.