| Title |
Green and efficient extraction strategy to lithium isotope separation with double ionic liquids as the medium and ionic associated agent
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10967-012-2251-7 |
| Authors |
Xu Jingjing, Li Zaijun, Gu Zhiguo, Wang Guangli, Liu Junkang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 25% |
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 4 | 33% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,032,776
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
#82
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,477
of 174,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.