You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
General Method for Ultrathin Free-Standing Films of Nanofibrous Composite Materials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the American Chemical Society, June 2007
|
DOI | 10.1021/ja0718974 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xinsheng Peng, Jian Jin, Emma M. Ericsson, Izumi Ichinose |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 72 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
Researcher | 15 | 19% |
Professor | 9 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Materials Science | 19 | 25% |
Chemistry | 18 | 23% |
Engineering | 8 | 10% |
Chemical Engineering | 4 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2014.
All research outputs
#3,315,928
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#10,042
of 62,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,970
of 70,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#41
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.