↓ Skip to main content

Preoperative second-line chemotherapy induces objective responses in primary breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Preoperative second-line chemotherapy induces objective responses in primary breast cancer
Published in
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, January 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00508-004-0282-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catharina Wenzel, Gottfried J. Locker, Rupert Bartsch, Ursula Pluschnig, Dagmar Hussian, Christoph C. Zielinski, Margarethe Rudas, Michael F. Gnant, Raimund Jakesz, Guenther G. Steger

Abstract

Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer results in high response rates, allowing breast-conserving surgery in patients primarily not suitable for this procedure. Tumors of patients with histologically proven breast cancer that fail to respond to preoperative chemotherapy are thought to be chemotherapy resistant. We questioned this hypothesis and treated 13 patients who did not respond to preoperative anthracycline-containing first-line treatment. Eight patients received a combination therapy consisting of epidoxorubicin and docetaxel as neoadjuvant first-line treatment and were treated with CMF as preoperative second-line chemotherapy. The other five patients did not respond to first-line FEC and were given paclitaxel or docetaxel as second-line treatment. A major response to treatment was observed in 10 of 13 patients (77%) during preoperative second-line therapy: one patient (8%) achieved pathological complete response (pCR) and nine patients (69%) partial response (PR). Three patients (23%) had stable disease (SD), and no patient had progressive disease (PD). Eight patients (62%) could undergo breast-conserving surgery. We conclude that it is possible to achieve objective responses including pCR with potentially non-cross-resistant neoadjuvant second-line therapy, leading to breast-conserving surgery in a high proportion of patients. Thus, preoperative second-line chemotherapy appears to be justified when breast conservation is an important treatment goal and may have potential in improved tailoring of neoadjuvant treatments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 40%
Researcher 4 27%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 40%
Computer Science 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2015.
All research outputs
#5,700,702
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Wiener klinische Wochenschrift
#149
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,634
of 142,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiener klinische Wochenschrift
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.