↓ Skip to main content

Satellite‐tracking of Northern Pintail Anas acuta during outbreaks of the H5N1 virus in Japan: implications for virus spread

Overview of attention for article published in Ibis, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Satellite‐tracking of Northern Pintail Anas acuta during outbreaks of the H5N1 virus in Japan: implications for virus spread
Published in
Ibis, March 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1474-919x.2010.01010.x
Authors

NORIYUKI YAMAGUCHI, JERRY W. HUPP, HIROYOSHI HIGUCHI, PAUL L. FLINT, JOHN M. PEARCE

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 3%
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Romania 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 49 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 4 7%
Professor 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 52%
Environmental Science 11 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ibis
#1,072
of 3,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,536
of 103,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ibis
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.