| Title |
Leaching Process Investigation of Secondary Aluminum Dross: The Effect of CO2 on Leaching Process of Salt Cake from Aluminum Remelting Process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11663-012-9678-7 |
| Authors |
Peng Li, Min Guo, Mei Zhang, Lidong Teng, Seshadri Seetharaman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 18% |
| Researcher | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 25% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 14% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2015.
All research outputs
#4,759,175
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
#23
of 660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,810
of 165,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 660 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them