| Title |
A novel method of cultivating cardiac myocytes in agarose microchamber chips for studying cell synchronization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, September 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-2-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kensuke Kojima, Tomoyuki Kaneko, Kenji Yasuda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 39% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 15 | 48% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#370
of 1,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,278
of 71,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,919 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them