| Title |
CYP2D6 Genotyping as an alternative to phenotyping for determination of metabolic status in a clinical trial setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AAPS Journal, October 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1208/ps020433 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzin McElroy, Jodi Richmond, Maruja Lira, David Friedman, B. Michael Silber, Patrice M. Milos, Christoph Sachse, Jürgen Brockmöller, Ivar Roots |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 13% |
| Professor | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 25% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 29% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#181
of 1,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,701
of 40,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them