| Title |
Solar Aluminum Production by Vacuum Carbothermal Reduction of Alumina—Thermodynamic and Experimental Analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11663-010-9461-6 |
| Authors |
M. Kruesi, M. E. Galvez, M. Halmann, A. Steinfeld |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 25% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 19 | 37% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 10% |
| Energy | 4 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,759,175
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
#23
of 660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,552
of 181,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 660 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them