Title |
The effect of iNOS deletion on hepatic gluconeogenesis in hyperdynamic murine septic shock
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-007-0638-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gerd Albuszies, Josef Vogt, Ulrich Wachter, Christoph Thiemermann, Xavier M. Leverve, Sandra Weber, Michael Georgieff, Peter Radermacher, Eberhard Barth |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 18% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Chemistry | 2 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,322,003
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,937
of 5,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,111
of 72,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.