↓ Skip to main content

Exons encoding the highly conserved part of human glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, January 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Exons encoding the highly conserved part of human glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, January 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00163851
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva Kaiser, Dirk Eberhard, Rolf Knippers

Abstract

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are important components of the genetic apparatus. In spite of common catalytic properties, synthetases with different amino acid specificities are widely diverse in their primary structures, subunit sizes, and subunit composition. However, synthetases with given amino acid specificities are well conserved throughout evolution. We have been studying the human glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase possessing a sequence of about 400 amino acid residues (the core region) that is very similar to sequences in the corresponding enzymes from bacteria and yeast. The conserved sequence appears to be essential for the basic function of the enzyme, the charging of tRNA with glutamine. As a first step to a better understanding of the evolution of this enzyme, we determined the coding region for the conserved part of the human glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase. The coding region is composed of eight exons. It appears that individual exons encode defined secondary structural elements as parts of functionally important domains of the enzyme. Evolution of the gene by assembly of individual exons seems to be a viable hypothesis; alternative pathways are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 75%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,949,499
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#408
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,045
of 61,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.