↓ Skip to main content

Phosphoproteomics analysis of a clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing isolate: expanding the mycobacterial phosphoproteome catalog

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phosphoproteomics analysis of a clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing isolate: expanding the mycobacterial phosphoproteome catalog
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suereta Fortuin, Gisele G. Tomazella, Nagarjuna Nagaraj, Samantha L. Sampson, Nicolaas C. Gey van Pittius, Nelson C. Soares, Harald G. Wiker, Gustavo A. de Souza, Robin M. Warren

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 59 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Computer Science 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#17,745,497
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#17,116
of 24,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,911
of 357,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#199
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.