| Title |
The history of fruit thinning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Growth Regulation, May 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1006330009160 |
| Authors |
F.G. Jr. Dennis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 23% |
| Researcher | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 60% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,864,291
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Plant Growth Regulation
#3
of 386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,446
of 40,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Growth Regulation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 386 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them