↓ Skip to main content

Repair of angle recession prevents pupillary capture of intrasclerally fixed intraocular lenses

Overview of attention for article published in International Ophthalmology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Repair of angle recession prevents pupillary capture of intrasclerally fixed intraocular lenses
Published in
International Ophthalmology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10792-018-0911-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuki Kujime, Masayuki Akimoto

Abstract

We evaluated a new concept for treating pupillary capture of the intraocular lens (IOL) following intrascleral fixation of the IOL. Pupillary capture of the IOL is a common postoperative complication that occurs after suturing and intrascleral fixation of the IOL. In such cases, blunt trauma is often related to zonular dialysis, iris retraction, iridodonesis, and angle recession. Several methods such as barricading by suturing, pupilloplasty, and pars plana fixation are reported to prevent pupillary capture. Although effective, none of these techniques fix iris-malposition and angle recession. We considered that repairing angle recession could correct the iris position and prevent pupillary capture recurrence. We repaired angle recession in four cases and have followed up. Pupillary capture was not observed in all three cases of larger IOLs for more than 9 months, but observed after 1 month in an IOL with normal 6 mm diameter, in which the angle was not properly lifted. In select cases, repairing angle recession may be useful for preventing pupillary capture after IOL suturing and intrascleral fixation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Other 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2023.
All research outputs
#18,616,159
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from International Ophthalmology
#531
of 1,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,259
of 331,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Ophthalmology
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,073 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.