| Title |
A portable system for collecting anatomical joint angles during stair ascent: a comparison with an optical tracking device
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dynamic Medicine, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-5918-8-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeroen HM Bergmann, Ruth E Mayagoitia, Ian CH Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 60 | 43% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Dynamic Medicine
#12
of 21 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,894
of 93,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dynamic Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them