↓ Skip to main content

ICA12(SOX13) autoantibodies are unlikely to be a useful marker for pre-clinical Type I diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, February 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
ICA12(SOX13) autoantibodies are unlikely to be a useful marker for pre-clinical Type I diabetes
Published in
Diabetologia, February 2001
DOI 10.1007/s001250051610
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. Lampasona, M. Scirpoli, E. Bosi, E. Bonifacio

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#3,131
of 5,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,135
of 113,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.