↓ Skip to main content

Hollow-layered nanoparticles for therapeutic delivery of peptide prepared using electrospraying

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Hollow-layered nanoparticles for therapeutic delivery of peptide prepared using electrospraying
Published in
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10856-015-5588-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manoochehr Rasekh, Christopher Young, Marta Roldo, Frédéric Lancien, Jean-Claude Le Mével, Sassan Hafizi, Zeeshan Ahmad, Eugen Barbu, Darek Gorecki

Abstract

The viability of single and coaxial electrospray techniques to encapsulate model peptide-angiotensin II into near mono-dispersed spherical, nanocarriers comprising N-octyl-O-sulphate chitosan and tristearin, respectively, was explored. The stability of peptide under controlled electric fields (during particle generation) was evaluated. Resulting nanocarriers were analysed using dynamic light scattering and electron microscopy. Cell toxicity assays were used to determine optimal peptide loading concentration (~1 mg/ml). A trout model was used to assess particle behaviour in vivo. A processing limit of 20 kV was determined. A range of electrosprayed nanoparticles were formed (between 100 and 300 nm) and these demonstrated encapsulation efficiencies of ~92 ± 1.8 %. For the single needle process, particles were in matrix form and for the coaxial format particles demonstrated a clear core-shell encapsulation of peptide. The outcomes of in vitro experiments demonstrated triphasic activity. This included an initial slow activity period, followed by a rapid and finally a conventional diffusive phase. This was in contrast to results from in vivo cardiovascular activity in the trout model. The results are indicative of the substantial potential for single/coaxial electrospray techniques. The results also clearly indicate the need to investigate both in vitro and in vivo models for emerging drug delivery systems.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Other 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 12%
Engineering 5 12%
Materials Science 4 10%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#316
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,332
of 278,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.