| Title |
Pharmacokinetic investigation of oral and IV dihydroergotamine in healthy subjects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, December 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00314992 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. A. Wyss, J. Rosenthaler, E. Nüesch, W. H. Aellig |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,708,257
of 24,372,222 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#200
of 2,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,683
of 64,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.