| Title |
Accelerated Light-Induced Degradation (ALID) for Monitoring of Defects in PV Silicon Wafers and Solar Cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Electronic Materials, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11664-010-1183-7 |
| Authors |
Marshall Wilson, Piotr Edelman, Alexandre Savtchouk, John D’Amico, Andrew Findlay, Jacek Lagowski |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 32% |
| Researcher | 11 | 32% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 16 | 47% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 9% |
| Energy | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Electronic Materials
#238
of 1,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,877
of 95,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Electronic Materials
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.