| Title |
Mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood: parameters for isolation, characterization and adipogenic differentiation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Cell Science, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10616-012-9428-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tatiana Taís Sibov, P. Severino, L. C. Marti, L. F. Pavon, D. M. Oliveira, P. R. Tobo, A. H. Campos, A. T. Paes, E. Amaro, L. F Gamarra, C. A. Moreira-Filho |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 21% |
| Researcher | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#153
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,236
of 256,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.