Title |
Development of a transformation system for the thermophilic fungus Talaromyces sp. CL240 based on the use of phleomycin resistance as a dominant selectable marker
|
---|---|
Published in |
Molecular Genetics and Genomics, September 1992
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00538710 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sanjay Jain, Henri Durand, Gerard Tiraby |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 6% |
Germany | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 33% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
Professor | 3 | 17% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 39% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 39% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#113
of 3,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,091
of 17,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.