↓ Skip to main content

Cloning, chromosomal mapping, and expression of the human eHAND gene

Overview of attention for article published in Mammalian Genome, November 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Cloning, chromosomal mapping, and expression of the human eHAND gene
Published in
Mammalian Genome, November 1997
DOI 10.1007/s003359900596
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark W. Russell, Priscilla Baker, Scigo Izumo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Student > Master 2 25%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 38%
Mathematics 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Computer Science 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,515,480
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Genome
#338
of 1,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,643
of 31,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Genome
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,138 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.