You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Microfluidic: An innovative tool for efficient cell sorting
|
---|---|
Published in |
ImmunoMethods, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.07.002 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julien Autebert, Benoit Coudert, François-Clément Bidard, Jean-Yves Pierga, Stéphanie Descroix, Laurent Malaquin, Jean-Louis Viovy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 3% |
France | 5 | 2% |
Portugal | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 2% |
Unknown | 280 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 94 | 31% |
Student > Master | 51 | 17% |
Researcher | 44 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 4% |
Other | 51 | 17% |
Unknown | 33 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 111 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 16% |
Physics and Astronomy | 27 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 7% |
Chemistry | 19 | 6% |
Other | 31 | 10% |
Unknown | 49 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,691,201
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from ImmunoMethods
#263
of 2,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,721
of 178,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ImmunoMethods
#6
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,527 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.