↓ Skip to main content

Molecularly thin nanoparticles from cellulose: isolation of sub-microfibrillar structures

Overview of attention for article published in Cellulose, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Molecularly thin nanoparticles from cellulose: isolation of sub-microfibrillar structures
Published in
Cellulose, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10570-009-9329-6
Authors

Qingqing Li, Scott Renneckar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 30%
Researcher 12 17%
Professor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 19 27%
Materials Science 10 14%
Engineering 9 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Chemical Engineering 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#312
of 1,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,238
of 122,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.