| Title |
An asymptotically optimal multiversion B-tree
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The VLDB Journal, December 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s007780050028 |
| Authors |
Bruno Becker, Stephan Gschwind, Thomas Ohler, Bernhard Seeger, Peter Widmayer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 21% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 58 | 75% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,981,964
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from The VLDB Journal
#40
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,550
of 93,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The VLDB Journal
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them