| Title |
Evaluation of preoperative serum markers for individual patient prognosis in stage I–III rectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tumor Biology, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13277-014-2338-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clemens Giessen, Dorothea Nagel, Maria Glas, Fritz Spelsberg, Ulla Lau-Werner, Dominik Paul Modest, Marlies Michl, Volker Heinemann, Petra Stieber, Christoph Schulz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 31 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2016.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#520
of 2,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,114
of 231,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#25
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,728 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.