↓ Skip to main content

Audiological Evaluation of Affected Members from a Dutch DFNA8/12 (TECTA) Family

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Audiological Evaluation of Affected Members from a Dutch DFNA8/12 (TECTA) Family
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10162-006-0060-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rutger F. Plantinga, Cor W. R. J. Cremers, Patrick L. M. Huygen, Henricus P. M. Kunst, Arjan J. Bosman

Abstract

In DFNA8/12, an autosomal dominantly inherited type of nonsyndromic hearing impairment, the TECTA gene mutation causes a defect in the structure of the tectorial membrane in the inner ear. Because DFNA8/12 affects the tectorial membrane, patients with DFNA8/12 may show specific audiometric characteristics. In this study, five selected members of a Dutch DFNA8/12 family with a TECTA sensorineural hearing impairment were evaluated with pure-tone audiometry, loudness scaling, speech perception in quiet and noise, difference limen for frequency, acoustic reflexes, otoacoustic emissions, and gap detection. Four out of five subjects showed an elevation of pure-tone thresholds, acoustic reflex thresholds, and loudness discomfort levels. Loudness growth curves are parallel to those found in normal-hearing individuals. Suprathreshold measures such as difference limen for frequency modulated pure tones, gap detection, and particularly speech perception in noise are within the normal range. Distortion otoacoustic emissions are present at the higher stimulus level. These results are similar to those previously obtained from a Dutch DFNA13 family with midfrequency sensorineural hearing impairment. It seems that a defect in the tectorial membrane results primarily in an attenuation of sound, whereas suprathreshold measures, such as otoacoustic emissions and speech perception in noise, are preserved rather well. The main effect of the defects is a shift in the operation point of the outer hair cells with near intact functioning at high levels. As most test results reflect those found in middle-ear conductive loss in both families, the sensorineural hearing impairment may be characterized as a cochlear conductive hearing impairment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Engineering 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#119
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,735
of 159,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.