↓ Skip to main content

Prospective, Multicenter Study of Managing Lower Extremity Venous Ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Vascular Surgery (Science Direct), July 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Prospective, Multicenter Study of Managing Lower Extremity Venous Ulcers
Published in
Annals of Vascular Surgery (Science Direct), July 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02132997
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas E. Arnold, James C. Stanley, Elaine P. Fellows, Georgia A. Moncada, Roger Allen, Jerry J. Hutchinson, William M. Swartz, Laura L. Bolton, C.F.H. Vickers, Morris D. Kerstein

Abstract

Seventy patients with 90 venous ulcers were randomly assigned to hydrocolloid or conventional dressing and compression therapy at four study centers. The ulcers had been present for a mean of 47.8 in the control and 46.2 weeks in the treatment group and 42% of all patients had recurrent ulcers. Ulcers treated with hydrocolloid dressings reduced 71% and control treated wounds reduced 43% in area after 7.2 weeks of treatment. Thirty-four percent of all ulcers healed. Mean time to healing was 7 weeks for the hydrocolloid dressing group and 8 weeks for the control group. Most ulcers were less painful at final evaluation, but reduction in pain was more pronounced in hydrocolloid-dressed ulcers (p = 0.03). At baseline as well as during follow-up, significant differences between study centers were observed. Ulcers in patients in the United Kingdom were larger and less likely to heal (p = 0.001). Size of the ulcer at baseline was associated with treatment response and time to healing (p = 0.002). Percent reduction in ulcer area after 2 weeks was also correlated with treatment outcome (p = 0.004) and time to healing (p = 0.002). When all treatment outcome predictors were analyzed together, only percent reduction in area after 2 weeks remained statistically significant (p = 0.002), with percent reduction during the first 2 weeks of treatment > 30% predicting healing.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Other 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Engineering 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Vascular Surgery (Science Direct)
#509
of 2,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,163
of 20,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Vascular Surgery (Science Direct)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,011 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them