| Title |
In vivo evaluation of antiparasitic activity of plant extracts on Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Apidologie, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13592-011-0076-y |
| Authors |
Martín Pablo Porrini, Natalia Jorgelina Fernández, Paula Melisa Garrido, Liesel Brenda Gende, Sandra Karina Medici, Martín Javier Eguaras |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 43% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2015.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Apidologie
#266
of 805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,196
of 117,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Apidologie
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.