↓ Skip to main content

Measurement and comparison of glycyrrhizic acid contents in root of licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch.) from different cultivating areas

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Forestry Research, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 380)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Measurement and comparison of glycyrrhizic acid contents in root of licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch.) from different cultivating areas
Published in
Journal of Forestry Research, June 2002
DOI 10.1007/bf02857240
Authors

Gu Hui-yan, Gong Li-dong, Yu Jing-hua

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 33%
Mongolia 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Forestry Research
#35
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,825
of 120,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Forestry Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them