↓ Skip to main content

Life Satisfaction Across the Lifespan: Findings from Two Nationally Representative Panel Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Social Indicators Research, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
289 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
Title
Life Satisfaction Across the Lifespan: Findings from Two Nationally Representative Panel Studies
Published in
Social Indicators Research, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11205-010-9584-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brendan M. Baird, Richard E. Lucas, M. Brent Donnellan

Abstract

Two large-scale, nationally representative panel studies (the German Socio Economic Panel Study and the British Household Panel Study) were used to assess changes in life satisfaction over the lifespan. The cross-sectional and longitudinal features of these studies were used to isolate age-related changes from confounding factors including instrumentation effects and cohort effects. Although estimated satisfaction trajectories varied somewhat across studies, two consistent findings emerged. First, both studies show that life satisfaction does not decline over much of adulthood. Second, there is a steep decline in life satisfaction among those older than 70. The British data also showed a relatively large increase in satisfaction from the 40s to the early 70s. Thus, age differences in well-being can be quite large and deserve increased empirical and theoretical attention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 256 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 19%
Student > Master 41 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 64 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 103 38%
Social Sciences 36 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 3%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 74 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,177,847
of 25,853,983 outputs
Outputs from Social Indicators Research
#105
of 1,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,871
of 177,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Indicators Research
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,853,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.