You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Collagen–phosphorylcholine interpenetrating network hydrogels as corneal substitutes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Materials, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wenguang Liu, Chao Deng, Christopher R. McLaughlin, Per Fagerholm, Neil S. Lagali, Belinda Heyne, Juan C. Scaiano, Mitchell A. Watsky, Yasuhiro Kato, Rejean Munger, Naoshi Shinozaki, Fengfu Li, May Griffith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 158 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 24% |
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 24 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 18 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,863,711
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Materials
#682
of 10,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,050
of 182,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Materials
#5
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.