| Title |
Design and rationale of FOCUS (PX-171-011): A randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of carfilzomib versus best supportive care regimen in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-415 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roman Hájek, Richard Bryce, Sunhee Ro, Barbara Klencke, Heinz Ludwig |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 18% |
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,097
of 8,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,721
of 171,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#29
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,365 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.