↓ Skip to main content

Clinical practice guideline for pediatric idiopathic nephrotic syndrome 2013: general therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Clinical practice guideline for pediatric idiopathic nephrotic syndrome 2013: general therapy
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10157-014-1031-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshitsugu Kaku, Yasufumi Ohtsuka, Yasuhiro Komatsu, Toshiyuki Ohta, Takuhito Nagai, Hiroshi Kaito, Shuji Kondo, Yohei Ikezumi, Seiji Tanaka, Shinsuke Matsumoto, Mayumi Sako, Kazushi Tsuruga, Koichi Nakanishi, Koichi Kamei, Hiroshi Saito, Shuichiro Fujinaga, Yuko Hamasaki, Hiroko Chikamoto, Kenji Ishikura, Kazumoto Iijima

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 14%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 26 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 29 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,998,305
of 23,848,132 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#357
of 767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,902
of 357,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,848,132 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 767 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.